| ▲ | arcanemachiner 4 hours ago |
| If this finally pushes adoption of truly open Linux phones, then this will end up being a good thing, and the greatest favor that Google could do for the open source community. Tragically, Linux phones have languished and are in an absolute state these days, but a lot of the building blocks are in place if user adoption occurs en masse. (Shout out to the lunatics who have kept this dream alive during these dark years.) |
|
| ▲ | cwillu 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It won't though, because there's a ecosystem of banking/insurance/whatever apps that have bought into the android/iphone lockdown mindsete that people will simply be locked out of. Open alternatives can grow when there is a viable means of slow growth, and cutting off the oxygen to such things is the implicit intent. |
| |
| ▲ | ipdashc an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > banking/insurance/whatever apps I know banking apps are the typical example, but I've always wondered why. I use my bank's app maybe once or twice a year when I need to Zelle someone, which I only need to do when they don't have Venmo. (Unless we consider Venmo a banking app.) I only have one bank's app installed, the rest of my banks I only interact with over their website, on desktop. As for insurance, I've never had an insurance company's app installed. Am I just an outlier here? Honestly, if I switched to a non standard OS, I'd be more annoyed about losing, say, Google Maps, Uber/Lyft, or various chat apps. Banking and insurance just don't come to mind at all as something I need my phone for. | | |
| ▲ | edent an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | My bank sends me an alert when my card is used to make a transaction - handy for spotting fraud. I get an alert when a payment comes it - handy for knowing if a client has paid. I can quickly check my balance - handy for knowing if I can afford another round of drinks. I can repay a friend in two taps - handy if they've paid for dinner. Is anything essential? No. Is it something people use multiple times per day? Yes! | | |
| ▲ | firtoz 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Could all of these be handled through openbanking? | | | |
| ▲ | Markoff 16 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I can get alerts in email or messages, no need dedicated app for that, I can track there also my balance, so only useful thing app provides are easy wire transfers from phone, which I never do, if I wanna transfer money is much more convenient work big display, proper keyboard and mouse than from phone. |
| |
| ▲ | 1vuio0pswjnm7 21 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | "I'm am just an outlier here?" No. The "banking app doesn't work" argument against non-corporate mobile OS, raised incessantly is HN comments, is bogus I want a "phone", i.e., small form factor computer, that can run something like NetBSD, or Linux. But I have no intention of using it for commercial transactions. Mobile banking is not why I want to run a non-corporate OS I want to use it for recreation, research and experimentation | |
| ▲ | Aerroon an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | 2FA is a requirement in Europe. I can't log into my bank account without my phone being able to run the app. | | |
| ▲ | xprnio 19 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | But 2FA is moot if it’s the same device as your bank app, is it not? | |
| ▲ | Markoff 13 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I would stop using bank requiring phone app to do banking, simple as that, both my main EU accounts use sms verification codes and extra password, which is fine with me. If they will require an app, they will lose customer. | |
| ▲ | dheera 18 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | 2FA and Google SafetyNet are two completely different things. Your banking app can implement 2FA without SafetyNet. |
| |
| ▲ | avtolik an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Banks often use their app for a second factor auth. here. | |
| ▲ | BenjiWiebe an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I can't deposit checks over the website, and I use a bank with no physical locations near me. | | |
| ▲ | nradov 24 minutes ago | parent [-] | | That's true, but the notion that we're still using paper checks in 2026 is so crazy. And yet they remain the cheapest way to handle many transactions in the US financial system. Like a lot of small healthcare providers still prefer to receive paper checks from insurance companies because the electronic payment processors take a 3% fee. |
| |
| ▲ | dheera 19 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I haven't had issues with the mobile apps of 3 of the most major US brokerages. They run fine on rooted phone. They do everything I'd want a bank to do anyway. Ditch your bank if they have issues. If their retention department asks why you're leaving, tell them their app doesn't work. |
| |
| ▲ | Denatonium an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | The best solution for this is to buy a $30 burner phone at Walmart and use it unactivated, tethered to your main de-Googled device. You can use the burner for only tasks requiring Play Integrity. Make sure to leave one star reviews on all such apps that you run into. |
|
|
| ▲ | richardboegli 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Have a look at this post https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46723594 from Emre @emrekosmaz It is a smartphone that runs Android, launches Debian, and dual-boots Windows 11 Actual link
https://nexphone.com/blog/the-tale-of-nexphone-one-phone-eve... |
|
| ▲ | good8675309 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Until Android is crippled it will continue to take resources away from Linux Phone development and companies that will launch phones for it |
|
| ▲ | spacebuffer 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| For me as a desktop linux poweruser, I find this potential transition pretty intimidating, I've never flashed a phone with a custom rom let alone switch to a completely different OS, and I am not sure if the phone can even be reset to its original OS, if things go south. |
| |
| ▲ | chrneu 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's relatively easy. It's basically a command for each step you want to do and it tends to fail gracefully nowadays. If you can install a linux distro you can flash a custom rom on a well-supported phone. If it were more mainstream I could see GUI apps to manage all this for people, if they don't already exist. Idk I just use adb. | | |
| ▲ | paulryanrogers 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's also high risk. I've bricked two phones doing it. | | |
| ▲ | a456463 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I flash phones almost every other week. And tablets. I have been flashing since Androids came out. But never bricked. But maybe that is why I don't have any problems. | |
| ▲ | Markoff 10 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | it's pretty much impossible to hard brick phone, you can almost always recover it I'm running custom ROMs for the last 15 years | |
| ▲ | Onawa 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I've been flashing phones for over 2 decades and have never bricked a phone. How did you manage that? | | |
| ▲ | brnt 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Same here. Just follow the LineageOS steps. | |
| ▲ | user3939382 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Are you seriously implying that flashing phones doesn’t risk bricking them or you’re not aware of that risk are you serious? | | |
| ▲ | luz666 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I am seriously unaware of the risks and also flashing brand new phones :) | |
| ▲ | wolrah 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Are you seriously implying that flashing phones doesn’t risk bricking them or you’re not aware of that risk are you serious? Yes, that is generally the case. As a general rule with an Android phone reflashing the OS itself or the bootloader carries no risk of bricking the device (meaning making it impossible to recover without specialized hardware and/or opening up parts that were not intended to be opened). There are plenty of ways to "soft-brick" a device such that you might need to plug it in to a computer, and adb/fastboot can definitely be a pain in the ass to use (especially on Windows), but if you have a device with an unlocked bootloader it's very rare to be able to actually brick the device while doing normal things. Now, if you're doing abnormal things like reflashing the radio firmware you can absolutely brick some devices there, but you don't have to do that just to boot an alternative OS and generally shouldn't be doing it without very good reason and specific knowledge of exactly what you're doing. I'm not going to say there are no devices where the standard process to flash an alternative OS is dangerous, but none of the relatively common ones I've ever owned or used have been built that way because OEMs don't want their own official firmware updates to be dangerous either. tl;dr: It is sometimes possible to brick a device by flashing the wrong thing incorrectly, but the risk of doing that if you are just installing an alternative OS through a standard process is basically zero. |
|
| |
| ▲ | crtasm 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Potential for a brick varies massively depending on phone model, doesn't it? |
| |
| ▲ | eldaisfish 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That describes relatively easy for you, but not for the average person who can’t even be bothered to change the default ringtone. | | |
| ▲ | keyringlight 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The challenge I've found when looking for instructions for flashing one of my old phones is the assumption of knowledge some rom builders have, or perhaps an assumption about their audience. This seems like it has the potential to bit someone in the ass because if they're relying on other sources like the lineageOS wiki or forum posts elsewhere for example there's no guarantee it'll stay available, complete, or relevant to their variant over time. It's an added burden for what is a gracious volunteer role, but it's a handicap if they want more people using the fruits of their labor. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | observationist 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Even if you have linux, there are still third parties that have control over your hardware. Even if you're using graphenos, you can't block the sim or the cellular radio stack, and likely other modules on the SoC, from at-will access to every sensor on the device. You can at least protect your files, unless there's a mitm or other vector that graphenos can't cope with. And at worst, they can simply clone all your encrypted bits and wait on Moore's law or sufficient cubits to go back and crack the copy, on the off chance there's anything they want with your data in the first place. |
| |
| ▲ | fsflover an hour ago | parent [-] | | My phone has hardware kill switches for modem, WiFi/Bluetooth and mic/camera. All three together also kill all sensors. | | |
| ▲ | observationist an hour ago | parent [-] | | If it's got a sim card, it's still phoning home and providing location data. You can't escape the panopticon. A faraday bag gets you mostly there, though, but the point isn't that you can maneuver against it, it's that the device and its operation is fundamentally compromised by design. There's a whole lot of shady crap underlying the infrastructure and the hardware that consumers cannot touch, pinephone / librephone or otherwise. It's not designed for consent. At best you can gain ephemeral relief, but even that is illusory, because by simple process of elimination, differential analysis allows fine grained ID and tracking of people even if they don't have accounts, phones, interact with websites, etc. It's not a shady cabal of lizard people, it's just the grubby natural alignment of interests by a wide ranging set of companies and regulators and groups who allow it to happen without imposing any accountability, and ensuring that the system remains structured such that no effective accountability can be imposed. Extorting constant streams of data for adtech is too valuable and the entire thing is too complex for silly things like ethics to interfere. | | |
| ▲ | fsflover an hour ago | parent [-] | | > If it's got a sim card, it's still phoning home and providing location data Only when the kill switch is on. I control it. Also, it's possible to get AweSIM service
hiding your data from the mobile operators. | | |
| ▲ | observationist 19 minutes ago | parent [-] | | For sure - and you can use WiFi only, set yourself up with a HaLow rig and give yourself a ~10mbps connection anywhere up to 10 miles from your home, suitable for voip and low rate streaming, throw in VPN, and remain completely off-net as far as cellular networks go. I'm actually planning on using a wireless touchscreen and mobile halow/raspberry pi network/storage stack to completely replace my phone, but the bigger issue is automated tracking of everything - if you're the only blank spot in a sea of known individuals, it's just a matter of seconds to id you, since everything everywhere about everyone is tracked online. We should be enforcing informed consent regulation of network infrastructure, treating privacy and anonymity as synonymous with liberty and freedom. Allowing the system to operate as it does is a choice; those with lots of money get to make it grow by exploiting a constant invasion of privacy with no concurrent return to the society being exploited. Phones aren't built to be privacy respecting, and kill switches are a mitigation of a symptom, they don't do anything to address the disease. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | shimman 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Expecting Google to give up control of one of the only alternative operating systems is right up there with believing in the tooth fairy. What you're saying should happen, but it will only happen when the government legislates it happens; which frankly they should be doing (along with nationalizing a few other software projects to be fair). A trillion dollar transnational corporation with massive monopolistic tendencies will never ever do the right thing. Expect to force feed it down their throats. |
| |
| ▲ | yason 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | In general, governments seem to be much more invested in making it illegal to have anything that is too open and too free. Even EU is lusting for draconian control features like chat control where you don't own and operate the software you installed on your device even if, at the same timem, they're trying to gnaw on the influence of Big Tech. |
|
|
| ▲ | beeflet 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The limitation of linux phones is hardware. I have been watching the progress of postmarketOS on the fairphone 4, and looks promising. |
| |
| ▲ | fsflover an hour ago | parent [-] | | https://puri.sm/posts/the-danger-of-focusing-on-specs/ Sent from my Librem 5. | | |
| ▲ | beeflet 25 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I don't care about specs, I care about functionality and price. The camera on the pinephone doesn't practically work because it is too slow and the quality sucks. You basicially cannot record videos whatsoever. I can't use the device for GPS navigation. I can run whatsapp within waydroid, but it isn't practical due to the battery life and startup limitations that imposes. The GPU on the pinephone sucks, is underpowered, doesn't support OpenGL ES 3 or vulkan, and the user interface is always slow as hell to navigate. So practically I cannot use it as a daily driver. Librem 5 does have enough GPU horsepower, a functioning camera, and good pmOS support. But $800 is a lot to ask to test out switching to linux with no guarantee that my workflow will work or I will have enough battery life. It looks like the librem 5 can't record videos or do GPS navigation yet. I am looking at the librem 5 specs again. The EG25-G is probably a better starting point for the modem now that it has been better documented and reverse engineered as a result of the pinephone project. It is interesting that the L5 has a generic smartcard reader though. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | IshKebab 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > If this finally pushes adoption of truly open Linux phones... It won't. |