|
| ▲ | Terr_ 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| All rulings can be better, but Kavanaugh contributed to making the mess in the first place, as he and conservative members of the court spent 2025 voiding lower-court injunctions against similar radical policies, essentially telling lower-courts to "let Trump move fast and break things." In other words, Kavanaugh is lying: He doesn't actually care about legal clarity or mess-prevention. If he did we wouldn't even be in this situation in the first place. |
| |
| ▲ | sjm-lbm 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I agree with your first point (and I wasn't trying to defend Kavanaugh, just pointing out that the dissent calls something out), but I disagree with your second. Kavanaugh isn't lying - this ruling causes some chaos and uncertainty and I think that one of the reasons Kavanaugh doesn't like it is because it causes some chaos and uncertainty - but, to your first point, he doesn't appear to be acting in good faith. The Supreme Court absolutely could have handled this much better, and is part of the reason there's so much to undo. |
|
|
| ▲ | vkou 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| In society, isn't it generally accepted that the person shitting on the floor be the one responsible for cleaning up after himself? |
| |
| ▲ | MadnessASAP 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Anybody who has worked a service/retail job can tell you that the person literally shitting on the floor rarely is the one to clean it up. And unfortunately that extends to the metaphor as well. Society would like to see those responsible for the mess to also be responsible for the cleanup. However society expects that everybody but the mess maker will be left cleaning up. | | |
| ▲ | jopsen 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, tax payers will pay the refund, and the interest accrued on the refund -- when the makaes it's wats through the courts in 3 years |
|
|
