| ▲ | franktankbank 8 hours ago | |
It is flip flopping policy as far as it was here one day and struck down the next. That's what matters to people attempting to start something here. I should have stated I was not interested in arguing the actual rule process, you have 6-3 vote from the Supreme Court in your favor. | ||
| ▲ | alex43578 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
It was absurd to think this was valid policy in the first place. The IEEPA clearly didn’t delegate unilateral tariff authority to the president, especially on the flimsy basis of a “trade emergency”. If Trump wanted a durable trade policy, work with the legislative majority to pass a real policy with deliberation - just like they should have done with immigration. | ||
| ▲ | pavlov 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Almost all legal experts said from the start the Trump’s approach to tariffs was unconstitutional. So who else could be to blame for the flip-flopping? The executive is supposed to uphold laws made by Congress, not throw spaghetti at the Supreme Court’s wall and see if it sticks. | ||