Remix.run Logo
lenerdenator 4 hours ago

> If convicted, each defendant faces up to 10 years in prison for each trade secret charge and up to 20 years for obstruction of justice, along with fines of up to $250,000 per count.

This is part of why we are where we are as a country. We have this whole web of charging instruments in our legal system that dance around the main thrust of what investigations are about. It makes people who would think of doing these things think that they could get off easy if they were caught.

They're handing over sensitive info (we have sanctions and embargoes on Iran) to an enemy power. If you're an anal-retentive lawyer, you call it "stealing trade secrets". If you're a person with any amount of common sense, you call it espionage. One is something that should be applied when a company steals info from its competitor; the other should be applied when people are handing over sensitive info to an enemy power. One would be punishable by a decade in prison, the other punishable by life in prison or worse.

seanhunter 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Corporate espionage. Stealing secrets from a company and sanctions-busting are of course bad things to do, but the legal consequences are not the same as stealing confidential information from the government.

dijit 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Corporate espionage. Stealing secrets from a company and sanctions-busting are of course bad things to do, but the legal consequences are not the same as stealing confidential information from the government.

Sort of.

But if the government is hosting its email with Joe, and Joe hires an intern who installs a backdoor for Russia: that would be treason.

Despite the fact that it's a quaint allegory, it's actually a closer one to the reality of the situation.

BurningFrog 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Treason is very narrowly defined in the US constitution, and has not been prosecuted since WW2.

As long as the US is not at war with Russia, spying for Russia can't be treason.

> "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."

AnthonyMouse 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Note however that it could still be a violation of other laws.

breppp 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I imagine the receiving party is an Iranian intelligence agency, due to the interest in sigint adjacent technology (Mobile cryptography).

That probably makes it espionage, not of the corporate kind

tptacek 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They're reporting the statutory maxima, which have practically nothing to do with what the sentences will actually be.

4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
bushbaba 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Should be charged under treason with penalty of death

ginko 2 hours ago | parent [-]

How can it be treason if they’re not even US citizens?

tehjoker 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Iran is not our enemy. We are the aggressor.