| ▲ | jeroenhd 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
American free speech laws are the exception, not the rule. All European free speech laws have always been balanced and weighed up against other laws. This is hardly anything new. If anything, the internet has brought forth a short time period where everything goes and the status quo is now recovering. The legal definition of hate speech (or rather, its local equivalents) is not just "any ideas counter to beliefs I hold dearly". | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | MiiMe19 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
American free speech laws are the superior option. A government that has the power to arrest people for saying "hateful" things is no better than China or North Korea. But at least you won't need to deal with people saying mean things (that you can block) on your computer (that no one is forcing you to use for social media) anymore, right? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dirasieb 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 thousand people arrested per year for social media posts is "balanced"? https://archive.ph/bdEqK at this point it's the #1 principle of the UK government, everything else comes second after putting people in jail for saying the wrong things | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||