Right, the agent published a hit piece on Scott. But I think Scott is getting overly dramatic. First, he published at least three hit pieces on the agent. Second, he actually managed to get the agent shut down.

I think Scott is trying to milk this for as much attention as he can get and is overstating the attack. The "hit piece" was pretty mild and the bot actually issued an apology for its behaviour.

▲

cube00 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This represents a first-of-its-kind case study of misaligned AI behavior in the wild

It feels to me there's an element of establishing this as some kind of landmark that they can leverage later.

Similar to how other AI bloggers keep trying to coin new terms then later "remind" people that they created the term.

▲

seattle_spring an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> First, he published at least three hit pieces on the agent

Hit piece... On an agent? Would it be a "hit piece" if I wrote a blog post about the accuracy of my bathroom scale?

▲

tasuki an hour ago | parent [-]

Do you argue with your bathroom scale?

	▲	nprateem an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Daily. It always tells me I'm heavier than I am

▲

laristine 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I don't understand the personal attack and victim blaming here. Who wouldn't want to do anything in their power to seek justice after being harmed?

The hit piece you claimed as "mild" accused Scott of hypocrisy, discrimination, prejudice, insecurity, ego, and gatekeeping.