In general the justice system don't care much what your idea of the law is.

If its not clear through the actuall law or the accompanying comments what constitutes hate speech, it will be cleared up by the court itself.

Do you really not understand the sort of slippery slope that presents?

	▲	Epa095 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		My point is that this is the norm, not the exception in legal systems. It's good for laws to be clear cut and unambiguous, but in practice the world is not, and laws gets interpreted as courts use them.