I feel like it depends on the platform and your location.

An anonomyous platform like Reddit and even HN to a certain extent has issues with bad faith commenters on both sides targeting someone they do not like. Furthermore, the MJ Rathburn fiasco itself highlights how easy it is to push divisive discourse at scale. The reality is trolls will troll for the sake of trolling.

Additionally, "AI" has become a political football now that the 2026 Primary season is kicking off, and given how competitive the 2026 election is expected to be and how political violence has become increasingly normalized in American discourse, it is easy for a nut to spiral.

I've seen less issues when tying these opinions with one's real world identity, becuase one has less incentive to be a dick due to social pressure.

In an attention economy, trolling is a rewarded behavior. Show me the incentives and I will show you the outcome.

Just wondering, who is it you think is contributing most to the normalization of political violence in the discourse?

Your answer to that can color how I read your post by quite a bit.