| ▲ | airstrike an hour ago |
| Feels like there's an opportunity for an "ethical ads" platform |
|
| ▲ | calebkaiser an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| There is a platform called ethical ads for developer focused advertising: https://www.ethicalads.io/ |
|
| ▲ | tcfhgj 7 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Oxymoron |
|
| ▲ | AuthAuth an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Mozilla tried this. But the only people who want this is consumers. Advertisers want as much info as possible to target ads so would never choose this option unless heavily pressured by consumers. |
| |
| ▲ | davidfischer 35 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Founder of EthicalAds here. In my view, this is only partially true and publishers (sites that show ads) have choices here but their power is dispersed. Advertisers will run advertising as long as it works and they will pay an amount commensurate with how well it works. If a publisher chooses to run ads without tracking, whether that's a network like ours or just buyout-the-site-this-month sponsorships, they have options as long as their audience generates value for advertisers. That said, we 100% don't land some advertisers when they learn they can't run 3rd party tracking or even 3rd party verification. |
|
|
| ▲ | nemomarx an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| does Google AdWords still exist? text only ads solves a lot of these issues |
| |
| ▲ | Loughla 44 minutes ago | parent [-] | | My favorite forum has ads on every page. One header and one footer. Text only as a link to the site or product being advertised. The advertisers pay the site owner himself. I've bought things from those ads because they're targeting the demographic on that site, not targeting me specifically. They're actually more relevant. Now that's not probably sustainable, but I have to imagine that the roi for the advertisers is higher than general targeted ads. I've never even clicked on one of those except by accident. | | |
| ▲ | nemomarx 24 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I don't understand why more companies don't do contextual ads, yeah. Why track users all around the web when you can go to a website about cars and put in car ads, or a website about music and sell concert tickets or etc? You already know everyone on that website is interested in the topic, and the analytics would be much cheaper this way. | | |
| ▲ | davidfischer 3 minutes ago | parent [-] | | They absolutely do. Every sponsorship you see on a podcast or a youtube video or a streamer is a contextual ad. Many open source sponsorships are actually a form of marketing. You could argue that search ads are pretty contextual although there's more at work there. Every ad in a physical magazine is a contextual ad. Physical billboards take into account a lot of geographical context: the ads you see driving in LA are very different than the ones you see in the Bay Area. Ads on platforms like Amazon, HomeDepot, etc. are highly contextual and based on search terms. |
|
|
|
