| ▲ | publicdebates 2 hours ago | |
And a difference in price that amortizes about the same. | ||
| ▲ | solarisos 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
That’s true for the consumer's wallet, but the 'amortization' breaks down when you look at the systemic cost. In software, the 'cheaply made coat' equivalent (bloated frameworks, unoptimized dependencies) creates a massive technical debt that doesn't just affect the buyer—it affects the entire ecosystem's energy consumption and hardware requirements. The Seawolves devs weren't just saving money; they were respecting the constraints of the medium. When we treat resources as infinite because they are 'cheap,' we stop being engineers and start being assemblers. | ||