| ▲ | alistairSH 11 hours ago |
| Won't those other nations just ban freedom.gov? |
|
| ▲ | Aloisius 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Nothing stops them from hosting it on fbi.gov, state.gov, etc. It's one thing to block some random .gov site unused for anything else, it's another thing to block a domain used for, say, filing flight plans. |
| |
| ▲ | jeroenhd 25 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Europeans don't generally use .gov so if the US tries to pull that, they'll just block whatever .gov their VPN is hosted on. Southern European countries are blocking whole Cloudflare IP ranges because of the massive grip on the government the sports licensing maffia has there. These countries also don't feature any direct flights to America as far as I can tell. These blocks may cause (temporary) issues for American business relations and tourism, but such side effects may not be considered so problematic if the US leverages their government infrastructure to attack European legislators. | |
| ▲ | tjohns 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Nit: If you're filing a flight plan, you do it with the country you're departing from. Even if you're piloting an aircraft departing into the US, it wouldn't have any effect on operations if you couldn't reach US websites. There's also several alternative ways for pilots to file flight plans outside of the web. (The flight plans get passed between countries via AFTN/AMHS, which are dedicated telecommunications networks independent of the Internet.) | | |
| ▲ | Aloisius 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I thought airlines still had to file passenger manifests with CBP separately, no? | | |
| ▲ | tjohns 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes, though that's separate from the flight plan. There's also several different ways to transmit the passenger manifest to CBP - including over a CBP-provided VPN and IATA "Type B" messages sent through ARINC/SITA. The network for Type B messages is also independent of the Internet (it was developed 60 years ago). |
|
| |
| ▲ | crossroadsguy 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If a Govt decides that I am pretty sure they won't stop at anything but TLD level banning. Besides I don't know about other countries (or EU) but I won't be surprised if our giant industrious neighbour already has infrastructure in place just for such
Trumpian shenanigans :) |
|
|
| ▲ | IAmGraydon 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Since no one seems to have a serious answer to this…the answer is yes, it would easily be blocked. Beyond that, absolutely no one would use this service. Therefore, it can be considered to be nothing more than political posturing by a weak administration. |
|
| ▲ | crest 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| They wouldn't dare ban a .gov domain and we will hide all of behind Cloudflare! /s |