Please provide evidence for what you considered to be normal to be an effective workforce for the ongoing task at hand (nation state tax collection).

▲

groundzeros2015 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The evidence was the baseline before the increase

▲

toomuchtodo 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The baseline was there was significant tax evasion by high net worth individuals. The staff up was to counter that, staffing down puts us back at reduced enforcement.

Someone has to pay to operate a nation state, you can’t borrow forever to fill the gap and there’s nothing left to cut. Roughly the bottom 60% of Americans do not make enough to have a federal income tax liability. So, we can kick the can on the top 40% paying until the bond vigilantes make the decision for the US.

▲

groundzeros2015 41 minutes ago | parent [-]

> The staff up was to counter that

Stated reasons may or may not be actual.

If you recall these were not just accountants but agents who carry guns etc.

I see this as very similar to the ICE situation. Biden has loyalty and power in IRS and so gave it money to help him police. As the government gets more corrupted I think we’ll find more agencies weaponized like this.

▲

toomuchtodo 39 minutes ago | parent [-]

Can you provide proof of this “loyalty and power” at the IRS to Biden mentioned? Because without proof, it sounds like a “deep state” conspiracy theory without evidence.

▲

groundzeros2015 26 minutes ago | parent [-]

I can provide evidence that the IRS and the majority of its employees have good relationships with democrats.

The equivalent question is can you provide proof that ICE provides power and is loyal to Trump?

I don’t think you would say that’s a deep state conspiracy.

	▲	toomuchtodo 11 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Thanks for the reply.