| ▲ | skizm an hour ago | |||||||
> The plaintiff is a 20-year-old California woman identified as K.G.M. because she was a minor at the time of her alleged personal injury. I didn't realize this was literally a single person claiming they were personally injured by literally every major social media company. How does that even work? What laws are purported to have been broken here? I wholeheartedly support some sort of regulatory framework around social media, but this specific case seems like a cash grab. It was already successful too, since Snap and TikTok have settled. | ||||||||
| ▲ | jumboshrimp an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
From a Rolling Stone article: "K.G.M.’s lawsuit was selected as a so-called bellwether case and is proceeding first among more than a thousand personal-injury complaints under a coordinated, court-managed process meant to eliminate the risk of inconsistent rulings at subsequent trials." | ||||||||
| ▲ | SpicyLemonZest 16 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
She alleges that social media applications deliberately got her addicted, knowing that might lead to the depression and suicidality she experienced. | ||||||||
| ||||||||