| ▲ | hexaga 4 hours ago | |
You're a user of jq in the sense of the comment you're replying to, not a developer. The developer is the developer _of jq_, not developers in general. | ||
| ▲ | fhd2 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Yes, that's exactly how I meant it. I might _rarely_ peruse some code if I'm really curious about it, but by and large I just trust the developers of the software I use and don't really care how it works. I care about what it does. | ||
| ▲ | Stefan-H 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
They can be “a developer” and use jq as a component within what they are developing. They do not need to be a developer of jq to have reason to look at jq’s code. | ||
| ▲ | tptacek 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
We're talking about Show HN here. | ||