| ▲ | discreteevent 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What the article is saying is: "the author (pilot?) hasn't generally thought too much about the problem space, and so there isn't really much of a discussion to be had. The cool part about pre-AI show HN is you got to talk to someone who had thought about a problem for way longer than you had. It was a real opportunity to learn something new, to get an entirely different perspective." | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tptacek 5 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Right, so it's about the person and how they've qualified themselves, and not about what they've built. I feel like I've been around these parts for a while, and that is not my experience of what Show HN was originally about, though I'm sure there was always an undercurrent of status hierarchy and approval-seeking, like you suggest. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||