| ▲ | d4mi3n 3 hours ago | |
I suspect this is partly due to the quality of documentation for Elixir, Erlang, and BEAM. The OTP documentation has been around for a long time and has been excellently written. Erlang/Elixer doc gen outputs function signatures, arity, and both Elixir and Erlang handle concepts like function overloading in very explicit, well-defined ways. | ||
| ▲ | bnchrch 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Thats a large reason for sure! I'd layer in a few more * Largely stable and unchanged language through out its whole existance * Authorship is largely senior engineers so the code you train on is high quality * Relatively low number of abstractions in comparisson to other languages. Meaning there's less ways to do one thing. * Functional Programming style pushes down hidden state, which lowers the complexity when understanding how a slice of a system works, and the likelyhood you introduce a bug | ||