| ▲ | Eisenstein 4 hours ago | |||||||
They address this specifically and hand-wave it away:
I think their conclusion is still important to consider, though. It makes a point beyond the practicalities and more towards the philosophy of approach. | ||||||||
| ▲ | gus_massa 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
That is an unrelated problem, that usually is not even a problem. For molecules, 10 Armstrong away is probably as good as infinite. For how many bananas should you eat per week to become the chess world champion, you can ask Wolfram Alpha to convert 2400kcal * 7 to bananas and get an upper bound. I think everyone agree that with infinite time a resources a brute force search is better in case there is a weird combination. But for finite time and resources you need to select a better strategy unless the search space is ridiculous small and smooth. | ||||||||
| ||||||||