| ▲ | nananana9 6 hours ago | |
That's an objectively correct statement, but I don't see how it makes sense as a response to my comment, as I'm advocating to use the more advanced feature-rich tool over the compiler-specific-hacks one. | ||
| ▲ | yjftsjthsd-h 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
If you're advocating switching languages, then there's no reason to stop at C++. It's more common to propose just converting the universe to Rust, but assembly also enjoys the possibility of being fairly easy to drop in on an existing C project. | ||
| ▲ | zephen 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> I don't see how it makes sense as a response to my comment Your comment started out with "just." As if there are never any compelling reasons to want to make existing C code better. But instead of taking that as an opportunity to reflect on when various tools might be appropriate, > as I'm advocating to use the more advanced feature-rich tool over the compiler-specific-hacks one. You've simply doubled down. | ||