> But notice the pattern: SQLite’s wins are on simple, single-row operations where both databases are already sub-millisecond. Stoolap’s wins are on the analytical and complex queries where the difference is 10x to 100x+.

So for a great many workloads, particularly multi-user, SQLite will be faster overall, as most application workloads will have many simple single/few row lookup operations per single/few row update operations, and an order of magnitude less complex analytical queries.

But this should be much faster for genuine analytical operations, and better suited to them due to support for things like temporal storage and queries.

Basically the age-old distinction between optimising for OLTP or OLAP operations.

Try it first. I hope you can give a shoot.