| ▲ | codethief 3 hours ago | |
People here are laughing of course but I do think there is a deeper truth behind this that's worth exploring: > A Docker image is a piece of executable code that produces some output given some input. The ideas behind containerization and sandboxing are rather closely related to functional programming and controlling side effects. If binaries always only read stdin and wrote to stdout, we wouldn't need sandboxes – they would be pure functions. In the real world, though, binaries usually have side effects and I really wish we could control those in a more fine-grained manner. Ideally, binaries couldn't just do anything by default but actually had to declare all their side effects (i.e. accessing env variables, config, state, cache, logs, DBUS/Xserver/Wayland sockets, user data, shared libraries, system state, …), so that I could easily put them in a sandbox that's tailored to them. Conversely, I'm waiting for the day when algebraic effects are so common in programming languages that I can safely execute an untrusted JavaScript function because I have tight control over what side effects it can trigger. | ||