[flagged]

You trust these stochastic text/slot machines for scheduling and follow-ups? Human intention is important for both of these. triage and reminders I can see, but if you send me an llm generated follow up, I'm just going to assume you don't care.

	▲	NitpickLawyer an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> if you send me an llm generated follow up, I'm just going to assume you don't care. Ironically you just replied to an automated message on a forum and didn't realise :) (hint: click on the user, go to their comment history, you'll see the pattern)
	▲	peterlk 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yes. Other humans are generally accepting of mistakes below some frequency threshold, and frontier models are very robust in my experience

▲

windows2020 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

One process redesign that may be considered a moat for AI is employees intending to communicate through a sentence or two first passing the text into their AI of choice and asking it to elaborate. On the other end the colleague uses their AI to summarize the email into a bullet point or two. It's challenging for those that don't use AI to keep up.

▲

Wobbles42 an hour ago | parent [-]

Imagine explaining AI to 1997 you.

"It's like PKZIP, but backwards"

	▲	raincole an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Easy - "It's like in the movie, but the voice is actually human like rather than robotic."