> unless there is some reasonable person standard applied here like 'everyone knows Harry Potter, and thus they should know it is obviously not CC0'

Why wouldn't that apply?

▲

xmprt 7 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm not a copyright expert and if you told me that Harry Potter was common domain then I'd probably be a bit surprised but wouldn't think it's crazy. The first book came out 30 years ago after all. On further research the copyright laws are way more aggressive than that (a bit too much if you ask me) but 30 years doesn't seem quick. Patents expire after 20 years.

	▲	jacquesm 7 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It would be incredibly naive to assume that a moneymaker like that is PD.
	▲	ijk 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		I find this fascinating, as I keep observing that there are pretty widespread differences between what people believe copyright does and what the law actually says.
	▲	pinewurst 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[flagged]