Open source = I should be able to fork it, change it, and use it

Open source = The maintainers should build exactly what I hysterically scream at them

If I had to choose one definition of open source from these two options, it's going to option 1 I'm afraid.

Once again confusing Open Source with Free Software.

	▲	bigstrat2003 21 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Neither "open source" nor "free software" has ever meant that the developers must accept contributions from third parties.
	▲	lokar 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		It seems to have a BSD license, what more are you looking for?
	▲	ninkendo an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Literally nothing to do with that distinction.