| ▲ | leflambeur 2 hours ago |
| do 99.9% of the people born there speak Dutch? When they became independent, were they 80%+ Reformed Dutch protestants? I don't reject the notion that NL vastly influenced Indonesia but the impact is not even remotely similar to PT and Brazil. |
|
| ▲ | alephnerd 2 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Was Brazil inhabited by countries with access to gunpowder, naval yards, proto-industrialization, and allies with transcontinental empires? No. It was largely Amerindians who were exterminated and genocided with ease. Conquering empires that were near-peers technologically is different from settling a continent which was at the losing end of the Colombian exchange. |
| |
| ▲ | leflambeur 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | You may want to look into the genetic composition of modern-day Brazilians to consider whether "Amerindians were exterminated" is a coherent way to represent it. edit: we are just comparing 2 completely different models here. You're not wrong about some things, you are just talking about a different thing than I :) edit 2: you are lacking information if you think that Brazilian Amerindians did not also partner with European powers (France and the NL itself comes to mind) against the Portuguese and it's somewhat amusing that you think that Portugal was never challenged on that vast territory by other powers. | | |
| ▲ | alephnerd 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | My point still stands. Their culture was completely decimated and they were largely replaced by European and African migrants, indentured servants, and slaves. Subjugating a native people that lacked metalworking, gunpowder, and literacy is different from conquering multiple nations that had all of those and was backed by the Ottomans, Mughals, and Americans. | | |
| ▲ | hugodan 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | and just how did they got the gunpowder? ;) | |
| ▲ | leflambeur an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | No, lol, that is not how that works. Your point is factually wrong, your point doesn't "stand". |
|
|
|