| ▲ | skydhash 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||
You’ll find more quality libraries in C because people don’t care about splitting them down to microscopic parcels. Even something like ‘just’ have tens of deps, including one to check that something is executable. https://github.com/casey/just/blob/master/Cargo.toml That’s just asking for trouble down the line. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bigfatkitten 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
You also won’t typically find C/C++ developers blinding yolo’ing the latest version of a dependency from the Internet into their CI/CD pipeline. They’ll stick with a stable version that has the features they need until they have a good reason to move. That version will be one they’ve decided to ship themselves, or it’ll be provided by someone like Debian or Red Hat. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pheggs 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
yes, the average amount of dependencies used per dependency appears to be much larger in rust and thats what I meant and is worrying me. In theory C can be written in a memory safe manner, and in theory rust can be used without large junks of supply vulnerabilities. both of these are not the case in practice though | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||