| ▲ | thornewolf 2 hours ago | |
For the comment from "Is Show HN dead? No, but it's drowning", the article author editorializes "One of the great benefits of AI tools, is they allow anyone to build stuff... even if they have no ideas or knowledge. One of the great drawbacks of AI tools, is they allow anyone to build stuff... even if they have no ideas or knowledge." into "One of the great benefits of AI tools is they allow anyone to build stuff, even if they have no ideas or knowledge. One of the great drawbacks is they allow anyone to build stuff." which removes the rhetorical effectiveness of the comment (and also breaks the promise of a quotation). I recommend that OP represents the source exactly. ____ I now see that this article contains multiple GPT-isms | ||
| ▲ | benatkin 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
It would be better if the article editorialized it thusly: > One of the great benefits as well as one of the great drawbacks of AI tools, is they allow anyone to build stuff... even if they have no ideas or knowledge. I'd paraphrase it with "said that" since the quotations indeed present as though verbatim. | ||