|
| ▲ | hashstring 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Makes me wonder. Say 5% of the free tier users converts to a paying customer within 5 years. And user growth is constant. Then over time, you will get a much larger free tier user base, compared to your paying customers (in absolute numbers).
At some point, it must become tempting to charge all free tier users a little bit to continue, because the group got so big, so there is a lot that can be earned there. Is this wrong, or should we expect this? |
| |
|
| ▲ | eleventyseven 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| But it isn't 'economics' as there is no actual data or science here, just a wild guess about what customer acquisition might currently cost. All it takes to rug pull is some exec speculating that 'the economics' have changed. |
| |
| ▲ | erikpukinskis 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Any mature SaaS company will have exact measurements of acquisition costs. This is advertising, sales staff, etc. This is one the the most fundamental components of SaaS accounting, it’s absolutely not a “wild guess”. | |
| ▲ | dagi3d 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Acquisition cost can definitely be calculated. I'm pretty sure they know how many customers do convert into paying users from their free tier and how much does it cost to get them through other channels | |
| ▲ | roughly 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > But it isn't 'economics' as there is no actual data or science here, just a wild guess Welcome to economics. |
|
|
| ▲ | wat10000 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| All it takes is for the decision-maker who gets the credit for cutting costs by removing the free tier to be a different person from the one who gets the blame for higher customer acquisition costs. Not saying it'll happen, just that it being a bad move isn't a guarantee. |