| ▲ | yoavm 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Please, go to https://annas-archive.li/torrents and check their torrent list generator. It will recommend you torrent files that need help seeding. Pick one, and see for yourself that it's practically impossible to audit its content. I just checked and the average torrent size is around 125GB. With a typical file in it being around 0.5mb, you're looking at auditing 250,000 files. And the filenames are all hashes. I would honestly love to know what you see as an alternative to trust here; an alternative that can still be helpful. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nerdjon 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
Again nowhere am I saying an alternative to trust, I can trust AA without blindingly trusting. Human error and malicious actors don’t immediately remove trust in a larger group, but it is also up to you to take some responsibility to protect yourself. Even the simple act of manually choosing the torrent you are going to seed is already more of a sanity check than what your tool is doing. You could decide that your personal safety guidelines are that you will seed older torrents but not new ones just to make sure that some time passes and nothing was snuck in. Is that perfect, no. But you know a lot more about what is happening on your device than a piece of software that just chooses what it is going to download and seed automatically. And you know before anything happens, not after. Personally my biggest problem there is not choosing to use a tool like this or even how you wrote it. My problem is that you don’t make any mention of this on GitHub and that you’re incredibly dismissive of any concerns about running this way. If this is how you want it to work fine, but simply acknowledge that there are risks involved that go beyond just simply trusting AA and you are asking for blind trust. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||