All the vendors paraphrase user data, then use the paraphrased data for training. This is what their terms of service say.

They have significant experience in this. Microsoft software since the 2014, for the most part, is also paraphrased from other people's code they find laying around online.

▲

benterix 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> All the vendors paraphrase user data, then use the paraphrased data for training. This is what their terms of service say.

It depends. E.g. OpenAI says: "By default, we do not train on any inputs or outputs from our products for business users, including ChatGPT Team, ChatGPT Enterprise, and the API."[0]

[0] https://openai.com/policies/how-your-data-is-used-to-improve...

▲

moritzwarhier an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> Microsoft software since the 2014, for the most part, is also paraphrased from other people's code they find laying around online.

That was pretty funny and explains a lot.

I wish I could do more :(

Instead I always break things when I paraphrase code without the GeniusParaphrasingTool

	▲	nyrikki 26 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		This is exactly why I moved to self hosted code in 2017. While I couldn’t have predicted the future, even classic data mining posed a risk. It is just reality that if you give a third party access to your data, you should expect them to use it. It is just too tempting of a value stream and legislation just isn’t there to avoid the EULA trap. I was targeting a market where fractions of a percentage advantage were important which did drive my what at the time was labeled paranoia