| ▲ | coffeefirst 3 hours ago | |
This is lost on people. A 98% accurate automation is useful if you can programmatically identify the 2% of cases that need human review. If you can’t, and it matters, then every case needs human review. So you lose a lot of benefits to the time sync, but since people tend to have their eye glaze over when the correction rate is low, you may still miss the 2% anyway. This is going to put a stop to a lot of ideas that sound reasonable on paper. | ||