| ▲ | tptacek 8 hours ago |
| It's quite good, but it gets very Six Feet Under by the end, and you have to suspend a lot of disbelief about technology; it's a little like Hackers in the sense that it's trying to communicate a feeling about operating in specific eras of computing, but not so much trying to realistically depict what it was like. Christopher Cantwell, the showrunner, is also doing the new series of The Terror (aka North Pole Bear Show) that's premiering this year. |
|
| ▲ | vidarh an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| I think the problem is that you can't really communicate that feeling without taking a lot of liberties, because it will seem boring and tedious to those not as invested, because it's hard to convey the excitement of a little box that can hold a small number of page-equivalents of text to someone who didn't know what it was like before. I was a child during the early parts of that era, and so for that part I got most from reading books and seeing the public announcements, but I started my first company during the era depicted towards the end - an ISP - and I feel they got that balance roughly right. But, sure, there were annoying deviation that is obvious to those of us who know how things happened. I don't think that was avoidable. |
|
| ▲ | aqme28 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| A new The Terror? The one that came out some years ago was incredible, and very under-discussed I think. |
| |
| ▲ | zerocrates 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | The first one, the one based on the book, was great and did fly a good deal under the radar. But definitely one of those ones with a core fanbase that evangelized for it and good critical notices. Elsewhere in this discussion Jared Harris's role in Foundation has been mentioned; he's a major, consistent, and excellent fixture in The Terror. Since they used the book's story already, they made a turn for the series to be an anthology of loosely thematically-similar stories (think American Horror Story). The basic setting of season 2 is Japanese internment during World War II in America, and it's from different writers than the first, and of course isn't adapting the novel anymore. It was much less popular both in terms of viewers and critics. I'm a little surprised they think the brand still carries enough power to put another original story in there under its name for a season 3. It's also a bit of a double-edged sword: you do get name recognition and some built-in initial audience, but you're also taking on expectations and baggage from the original. This is a factor in season 2's tepid reception, and there have been other similar attempts to slide something unrelated in under an existing banner that backfired: True Detective Night Country comes to mind. |
|
|
| ▲ | kgwxd 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| By the end, the tech is just a plot device. The thing that gets us to the thing. |
|
| ▲ | tsunamifury 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Hard disagree. The number of micro details it got right was insane. You’d have to be pedantic to think otherwise. Right down to obscure LucasArts first online game. |
| |
| ▲ | carlmr 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | It’s funny, I’d say the details are right, but the overall picture is still wrong. It tries to cram too many things into this one show. Like a medley of computing history. | | |
| ▲ | sirmarksalot an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, the the characters kind of feel like Doonesbury characters, where they just slot in wherever they're needed at a particular moment in history. Each season's story by itself feels authentic, but when you watch their character arcs from start to finish, each person involved would have to be a generational talent. And it's not like that kind of thing never happens, like look at General Magic and its through-lines through the tech industry up until 2015 or so, but it just happens too conveniently in the show. Particularly Bosworth's role seems far-fetched to me. He's already at the end of his career in season 1, and somehow he remains relevant through the internet age? The "Phoenix" monologue in the last episode evokes nostalgia for everything Donna and Cameron have been through, but it also breaks suspension of disbelief by pointing out just how much of history these two people have been involved with firsthand. |
|
|