| ▲ | DonHopkins 3 hours ago | |
The use of the term "operator" in this liability minimization document cosplaying as reflection reminds me of how Netochka Nezvanova (aka nameless nobody, integer, antiorp, m2zk!n3nkunzt, etc) referred to her users as "nato.0+55+3d operators" circa 1999. https://nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-bold-0101/msg0023... And 25 years later, OpenClaw can't hold a candle to nato.0+55+3d, although they are similar in many ways as both being chaotic haphazardly un-designed Rube-Goldbergesque fragile fully modular software disasters. Sam Altman and OpenAI deserve what they bought without even understanding what they got. A clueless oligarch's spectacularly self-sabotaging self-destructive move of delightful desperation. Nato.0+55+3d: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nato.0%2B55%2B3d X: The First Fully Modular Software Disaster (art.net): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15035419 He’s trying to perform three contradictory roles at once with faux humility + shrugging nihilism: 1. Curious hacker-scientist doing an experiment for the public good 2. Totally hands-off innocent bystander 3. Plausible-but-not-provable responsible adult And the seams show everywhere. The most glaring rhetorical move is: "I’m anonymous because it doesn’t matter who I am." That’s classic. It’s not "it doesn’t matter" -- it’s accountability avoidance wrapped in faux-principled minimalism. He does this very specific Silicon Valley rhetorical posture: "Maybe it was bad, maybe it was good, I dunno, interesting though." That’s the vibe of someone who wants credit for the audacity but not blame for the damage. Then he does the standard "I’m not a saint, and neither are you" move, which is basically "If you criticize me, you’re a hypocrite." That’s not contrition. That’s preemptive moral blackmail. It’s like prompt-engineering a little miniature Elon Musk. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22352276 DonHopkins on Feb 18, 2020 | parent | context | un‑favorite | on: Max/MSP: A visual programming language for music a... Bravo! If you enjoyed that anti-Max performance art trolling, but thought it wasn't spectacularly hyperbolic and sociopathic enough, I recommend looking up some of the classic flames on the nettime mailing list by Netochka Nezvanova aka "NN" aka "=cw4t7abs", "punktprotokol", "0f0003", "maschinenkunst" (preferably spelled "m2zk!n3nkunzt"), "integer", and "antiorp"! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netochka_Nezvanova_(author) >Netochka Nezvanova is the pseudonym used by the author(s) of nato.0+55+3d, a real-time, modular, video and multi-media processing environment. Alternate aliases include "=cw4t7abs", "punktprotokol", "0f0003", "maschinenkunst" (preferably spelled "m2zk!n3nkunzt"), "integer", and "antiorp". The name itself is adopted from the main character of Fyodor Dostoyevsky's first novel Netochka Nezvanova (1849) and translates as "nameless nobody." She (or he or they or it) were the author of the NATO.0+55+3d set of extensions for Max, which predated Jitter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nato.0%2B55%2B3d >NATO.0+55+3d was an application software for realtime video and graphics, released by 0f0003 Maschinenkunst and the Netochka Nezvanova collective in 1999 for the classic Mac OS operating system. Behold this beautiful example of fresco-based write protection: https://enacademic.com/pictures/enwiki/78/Nato.0%2B55%2B3d.p... http://www.skynoise.net/2005/10/06/solu-dot-org-vj-interview... >>>What’s your connection with the notorious ‘nato’ software? >Nato was the first software that gave me the push to start exploring the live visual world.. before that I did video art making analogue video, and imposing graphics with amiga. Then multimedia and internet projects seemed to offer more possibilities and not until finding Nato did I return to pure video. Fiftyfifty.org was distributing Nato in the beginning, and invited Netoschka Nezvanova various times to Barcelona, my connection with Nato was quite close but now I’m using the “enemy” software Jitter and sometimes Isadora. Jitter is far more complicated and more made for engineers/programmers than Nato, which was basically a video object library for max/msp, and more fun – it seemed always so fragile, and easy to lose. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8418703 DonHopkins on Oct 6, 2014 | parent | favorite | on: "Open Source is awful in many ways, and people sho... Does anybody remember the nettime mailing list, and the amazing ascii graphics code-poetry performance art trolling (and excellent personalized customer support) by Netochka Nezvanova aka NN aka antiorp aka integer aka =cw4t7abs aka m2zk!n3nkunzt aka punktprotokol aka 0f0003, the brilliant yet sociopathic developer of nato.0+55+3d for Max? Now THAT was some spectacular trolling (and spectacular software). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netochka_Nezvanova_(author) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nato.0%2B55%2B3d http://www.salon.com/2002/03/01/netochka/ The most feared woman on the Internet Netochka Nezvanova is a software programmer, radical artist and online troublemaker. But is she for real? The name Netochka Nezvanova is a pseudonym borrowed from the main character of Fyodor Dostoevski’s first novel; it translates loosely as “nameless nobody.” Her fans, her critics, her customers and her victims alike refer to her as a “being” or an “entity.” The rumors and speculation about her range all over the map. Is she one person with multiple identities? A female New Zealander artist, a male Icelander musician or an Eastern European collective conspiracy? The mystery only propagates her legend. Cramer, Florian. (2005) "Software dystopia: Netochka Nezvanova - Code as cult" in Words Made Flesh: Code, Culture, Imagination, Chapter 4, Automatisms and Their Constraints. Rotterdam: Piet Zwart Institute. https://web.archive.org/web/20070215185215/http://pzwart.wdk... Netochka Nezvanova was a massively influential online entity at the turn of the millennium. An evolution of various internet monikers, among them m2zk!n3nkunzt, inte.ger, and antiorp, Nezvanova has collectively been credited for writing a number of early real-time audiovisual and graphics applications. She was also a prolific and divisive presence on email lists, employing trolling as a form of propaganda and as a tool for creative disruption—though, at times, users adopting the moniker also engaged in harassment and other destructive behaviors. Among her most well-known pieces of software are the data visualization application m9ndfukc.0+99, which runs within a custom browser created for the app, and the realtime audiovisual manipulation tool, NATO.0+55+3d (which would later be repurposed as Jitter by Cycling ’74). Using data as raw material, these applications mined the artistic potential of noise, randomness, and the unexpected. In spite of (or perhaps in service to) the many pieces of software attributed to this anonymous online entity, the singular lasting impression of Nezvanova has been rooted in her seriously anarchic attitude—in the elusive, yet public, persona that she carefully crafted as a hybrid, internet-based act of performance art. Whether trailing code poetry across nettime mailing lists and online forums, or distributing software licenses at contentious fees to academics, Nezvanova was using information architecture itself as a medium. Often times, she would forgo the legibility of clean software design to produce unpredictable outcomes, and even reveal discrete truths. https://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-bold-0101/msg... | ||
