| ▲ | colordrops 3 hours ago | |
I'm still blown away that AMD hasn't made it their top priority. I've said this for years. If I was AMD I would spend billions upon billions if necessary to make a CUDA compatibility layer for AMD. It would certainly still pay off, and it almost certainly wouldn't cost that much. | ||
| ▲ | woctordho an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
They've been doing it all the time and it's called HIP. Nowadays it works pretty well on a few supported GPUs (CDNA 3 and RDNA 4). | ||
| ▲ | ddtaylor 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
AMD did hire someone to do this and IIRC he did, but they were afraid of Nvidia lawyers and he released it outside of the company? | ||
| ▲ | andy_ppp 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Moving target, honestly just get PyTorch working fully (loads of stuff just doesn’t work on AMD hardware) and also make it work on all graphics cards from a certain generation. The matrix of support needed GFX cards, architectures and software together is quite astounding but still yes that should have at least that working and equivalent custom kernels. | ||