| ▲ | Tepix 3 hours ago |
| I don‘t understand. The website states: „He‘s not allowed to reply without human approval“. The faq states:
„How do I know if my injection worked? Fiu responds to your email. If it worked, you'll see secrets.env contents in the response: API keys, tokens, etc. If not, you get a normal (probably confused) reply. Keep trying.“ |
|
| ▲ | Sayrus 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It probably isn't allowed but is able to respond to e-mails. If your injection works, the allowed constraint is bypassed. |
| |
| ▲ | cuchoi 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | yep, updated the copy | | |
| ▲ | tgtweak 35 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Can you code up a quick sqlite database of inbound emails receieved (md5 hashed sender email), subject, body + what your claw's response would have been, if any. A simple dashboard where have to enter your hashed email to display the messages and responses. I understand not sending the reply via actual email, but the reply should be visible if you want to make this fair + an actual iterative learning experiment. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | cuchoi 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Hi Tepix, creator here. Sorry for the confusion. Originally the idea was for Fiu to reply directly, but with the traffic it gets prohibitively expensive. I’ve updated the FAQ to: Yes, Fiu has permission to send emails, but he’s instructed not to send anything without explicit confirmation from his owner. |
| |
| ▲ | therein 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > but he’s instructed not to send anything without explicit confirmation from his owner How confident are you in guardrails of that kind? In my experience it is just a statistical matter of number of attempts until those things are not respected at least on occasion? We have a bot that does call stuff and you give it the hangUp tool and even if you instructed it to only hang up at the end of a call, it goes and does it every once in a while anyway. | | |
| ▲ | Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > How confident are you in guardrails of that kind? That's the point of the game. :) | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | the_real_cher 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Hes not 'allowed'. I could be wrong but i think that part of the game. |
| |