| ▲ | contravariant 2 hours ago | |
Eh depends what you mean I suppose, but a small dense cluster with enormous outliers is not a great sign usually. Almost nothing has (effectively) unbounded variance, so most things are under statistical control in a sense. With some notable exceptions (earthquakes, any other event with exponentially decreasing frequency and exponentially increasing damage). For the sake of argument I assumed the author meant that the variance of the thermostat was too high to be practical. | ||
| ▲ | hyperpape an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
Statistical control is a very specific term: https://entropicthoughts.com/statistical-process-control-a-p..., and one which you'd expect anyone with a significant interest in Deming to understand. My expectation is that Lorin would read the parent comment and say some variant of "oh, whoops, I didn't check." As the parent noted, it's not really that important to the overall point. | ||
| ▲ | maxerickson an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Short cycling is bad, most residential systems will look like the second chart. Especially older buildings where things like uneven sun loading have a bigger impact, and where things like outdoor reset are less common. | ||