| ▲ | mikenew 11 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
The side effect of trying to enforce this kind of sensitivity is that you make certain things taboo to talk about. And this is a good example of something that should be easy for someone to talk or even joke about because it makes dipping into that conversation much easier. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | janwillemb 5 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Douglas Crockford nearly got cancelled because he qualified JavaScript as "promiscuous". People not knowing what the word means plus having a sense of urgency about sensitivity can be a dangerous combination. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | notfed 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Is there a name for this? I think about this all the time. I've always had a theory that some offensive words may actually be persisting longer solely because we essentially calcify their definitions and never allow them to evolve into new less offensive meanings. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | swader999 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
This is well researched. See the Werther Effect. Casual, trivial, glamorized, or humorous framing behaves like contagion exposure. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sillywabbit 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
How about Rogue-like Linux? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||