| ▲ | givemeethekeys 3 hours ago |
| Don't get hung up on "14 year old". Pay attention to "took up origami 6 years ago". That's 6 years of passionate learning, experimenting and improvement. |
|
| ▲ | nerdsniper 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Also, ‘years’ tend to be a lot more hours for kids, and each hour yields more learning due to neuroplasticity. I learned so much faster at 15 than I do at 35. I know more now, which often more than makes up for slower learning, but I can’t learn difficult novel subjects in depth as fast as I once did. I’m glad I learned OS in depth during high school via Gentoo linux. And engineering/physics/math in college. It’s very easy to assimilate any new knowledge which can be understood through those areas of first principles. But learning more advanced math is quite a task now. |
| |
| ▲ | sigmoid10 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Can you really say that unless you switched fields multiple times? Of course you'll pick up on math and physics faster in high school than in college or postgrad, but that's because the problems get way, way harder as you progress. I've found that even in my late 30s I can still easily pick up new skills outside my field of expertise as long as I start with the basics that could also be picked up by a high-schooler. I started learning a new language last year and thanks to modern study apps, I actually find it easier today. Of course it will still take a long time to become an expert, but I'm not sure it would need more total hours than if I had started 20 years ago. It just gets more difficult to allocate the necessary hours for learning. | | |
| ▲ | nerdsniper 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Can you really say that unless you switched fields multiple times? I have ;-) far too many times! Even going back and taking undergrad math coursework that my engineering curriculum didn't have like Discrete Math or Statistics got a lot harder than calculus / differential equations was when I was younger. I felt like I got less out of each hour, and also couldn't put in as many hours - not just because I have more responsibilities, but also because my brain just gets tired after fewer hours. |
| |
| ▲ | avhception an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Gentoo is what really made Linux click for me, too. I'm still very, very glad for that and remain a loyal user to this day! Although I've had to restrict it to the 2 desktop machines. Maybe I should give it a shot again on the laptops, now that binary packages are universally available... | |
| ▲ | 6r17 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don't know - i'm 33 ~ now - recently with AI learning is much easier - don't get me wrong I definitely won't say that the brain does not slow down - but I'd definitely argue that we have advantages over kids - be it discipline, knowing how to learn ; and stuff like that - for example let's take coq which is I suppose one of the hardest thing we can learn - you can decompose it in ways myself as a kid or as a 20yo wouldn't even be able to. What I mean is that there is a lot of complexities or stuff i would get stuck upon that I just fly over today and know I'm alright - much better ability to focus in a sense | | |
| ▲ | jjmarr an hour ago | parent [-] | | I learned coq as a teenager because the name was funny and one defined everything in terms of the `succ` function. Never underestimate our motivation. | | |
| |
| ▲ | globalnode an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm learning better now the older I get. More good'erer. |
|
|
| ▲ | uoaei 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Also don't get hung up on "folded". He hasn't innovated a design (it was invented by a Japanese astrophysicist, Miura-Ori), merely measured sustainable load across different designs. |
| |
| ▲ | adfm 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Don't get hug up on "invented". Ruth Asawa registered for (1956) and received US patent 185,504 on June 16, 1959 at the suggestion of her professor, Buckminster Fuller. https://theartian.com/ruth-asawa-patent-collaboration/ | | |
| ▲ | Centrino 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Don't get hung up on "patent". You can't patent an idea, you patent a specific implementation of an idea. The boy experimented to find the optimal parameters (height, width, angles) for load bearing of that earlier invention. So, the result of his work would warrant a new patent, of course with reference to all earlier patents of which his work is an improvement. |
| |
| ▲ | croisillon 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | i hear he didn't even produce the paper himself | |
| ▲ | avadodin 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Being able to hold 10x the weight of paper doesn't sound so impressive that it would require an astrophysicist to invent it. I was more ready to accept the headline if it had been invented by the kid. Are you telling me you can't roll up 10 origami papers and stand them on a reasonably stable origami pattern? | | | |
| ▲ | ForHackernews 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | He literally did fold all the folds himself. He didn't even get an LLM to reskin VS Code for him and apply to Y Combinator. | |
| ▲ | nine_k 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | "Miura" is the name of the astrophysicist. "Ori" (折り) just means "fold", as in "origami" = "fold+paper". |
|
|
| ▲ | dottjt 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Rather than age, isn't this more a trait of autism than anything else? |
| |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > isn't this more a trait of autism than anything else? No. It’s a sign of drive and discipline. The latter, specifically the focus element, overlaps with autism. But more broadly it does not. (There are a lot of impressive teenagers applying themselves diligently to impressive ends. Most of them are not on the spectrum, though I suspect mild autism is slightly over-represented in that set.) | |
| ▲ | dbacar 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | And this is all you can come up with this story? | |
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | anonym29 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not all autism presents with intense narrow interests, and not all expressions of intense narrow interest are autism. Would you say the same for a teenage sports prodigy? | | |
| ▲ | dottjt 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Of course. But obviously I wouldn't be referring to those other types of autism in this case. Why would I? |
| |
| ▲ | 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | nephihaha 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | You're assuming that autism is always going to be a disadvantage. In fact, the obsessive focus mirrors scientific practice. Good luck to him, I respect him. |
|