| ▲ | andai 4 hours ago |
| What prevents 100 Billion ChatGPTs from using any protocol? |
|
| ▲ | css_apologist 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| cost, and we can create policy (shocker) also what specifically are you worried about these 100 billion chatgpts doing? |
| |
| ▲ | coldtea 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Cost is irrelevant if they get more out of doing it than the processing costs. | | |
| ▲ | bigbuppo 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Do they get more out of it than it costs, or are they still in the "people are just giving us money in the hopes that one day it turns a profit even though we're not charging nearly enough to make a profit" phase? | | |
| ▲ | coldtea an hour ago | parent [-] | | You're describing the AI companies and their business model. I'm answering to that cost being a problem regarding "what prevents 100 Billion ChatGPTs from using any protocol?" - the context I have in mind for the above being scammers, political manipulators, spam, and people like that using ChatGPT/LLMs to take advantage of various protocols for profit (and the 100 billion figure being a figure of speech meaning "very many"). |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | kgwxd 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Nothing, and that's fine. |
| |
| ▲ | shafoshaf an hour ago | parent [-] | | If you are trying to stop monopolization, then having a large organization/government swarm the protocol gives them an effective monopoly. Being able to put a drop of clean water into an ocean of corruption is not really a working system. |
|
