What's the point of building something that already exists in open source. It's just going to use code that already exists. There's probably dozens of examples written by humans that it can pull from.

▲

embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent [-]

What do you suggest we build instead, that hasn't already been done? I've been developing for decades, and I can't think of a single thing that hasn't already been kind of done either in the same or other language, or at least similar.

▲

prmph an hour ago | parent [-]

I want a language with:

- the memory, thread safety, and build system of Rust

- the elegant syntax of OCaml and Haskell

- the expressive type system of Haskell and TypeScript

- the directness and simplicity of JavaScript

Think coding agents can help here?

	▲	viraptor a minute ago \| parent [-]
		You have conflicting requirements there - expressive type systems are not direct and simple. And elegant is subjective. But seriously though: have you tried to see how far you can get with the design right now? You can start iterating on it already, even if the implementation will lag.