| ▲ | da_chicken 4 hours ago | |
Yeah, this seemed like a very long way to say, "Our RDBMS has system catalogs," as if it's 1987. But then, they're also doing JOINs with the USING clause, which seems like one of those things that everybody tries... until they hit one of the several reasons not to use them, and then they go back to the ON clause which is explicit and concrete and works great in all cases. Personally, I'd like to hear more about the claims made about Snowflake IDs. | ||
| ▲ | zabzonk 11 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
> doing JOINs with the USING clause I'm ashamed to say that despite using SQL from the late 1980s, and as someone that likes reading manuals and text books, I'd never come across USING. Probably a bit late for me now to use it (or not) :-( | ||