Do you believe you could not find humans who would do this?

That's not really the point. If our definition of AGI does not include "being able to reliably do logic" then what are we even talking about? We don't really need computers with human abilities--we have plenty of humans. We need computers with _better_ abilities.

▲

AnimalMuppet 3 hours ago | parent [-]

OK, but "what we need" is not the question. If the definition of AGI is "as smart as the average human in all areas", then it doesn't matter if the average human is pretty useless at a lot of tasks, that's still the definition of AGI.

But I'd like to think that, even though you could find exceptions, the average human is never confused about whether dogs can lay eggs or not.

	▲	pixl97 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I reached your view the day my grandma told me I was wrong and a hummingbird was a type of insect... Like, it's in the name.

▲

NoMoreNicksLeft an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

His objection might be that those humans aren't actually intelligent.

▲

3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]