| ▲ | _heimdall 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
At least during the Covid response, your concerns over anti-mask and anti-vaccine issues seem unwarranted. The claims being shared by officials at the time was that anyone vaccinated was immune and couldn't catch it. Claims were similarly made that we needed roughly 60% vaccination rate to reach herd immunity. With that precedent being set it shouldn't matter whether one person chose not to mask up or get the jab, most everyone else could do so to fully protect themselves and those who can't would only be at risk if more than 40% of the population weren't onboard with the masking and vaccination protocols. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Nevermark 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> that anyone vaccinated was immune and couldn't catch it. Those claims disappeared rapidly when it became clear they offered some protection, and reduced severity, but not immunity. People seem to be taking a lot more “lessons” from COVID than are realistic or beneficial. Nobody could get everything right. There couldn’t possibly be clear “right” answers, because nobody knew for sure how serious the disease could become as it propagated, evolved, and responded to mitigations. Converging on consistent shared viewpoints, coordinating responses, and working through various solutions to a new threat on that scale was just going to be a mess. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | socialcommenter 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I specifically wasn't referring to that instance (if anything I'm thinking more of the recent increase in measles outbreaks), I myself don't hold a strong view on COVID vaccinations. The trade-offs, and herd immunity thresholds, are different for different diseases. Do we know that 0.1% prevalence of "unvaccinated" AI agents won't already be terrible? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||