| ▲ | Aurornis 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> Peter single handedly got many of us taking Codex more seriously, at least that's my impression from the conversations I had. Comments like this feel confusing because I didn't have any association between Codex and OpenClaw before reading your comment. Codex was also seeing a lot of usage before OpenClaw. The whole OpenClaw hype bubble feels like there's a world of social media that I wasn't tapped into last month that OpenClaw capitalized on with unparalleled precision. There are many other agent frameworks out there, but OpenClaw hit all the right notes to trigger the hype machine in a way that others did not. Now OpenClaw and its author are being attributed for so many other things that it's hard for me to understand how this one person inserted himself into the center of this media zeitgeist | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Multiplayer 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
He's been on a number of podcasts - lex recently, and is really emphatic about Codex as the breakthrough solution he relies on. I just looked and on the handful of podcasts there are about 2,000,000 views this past week and half or so. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | yks 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It's how Steve Yegge became a "father of agentic orchestration" or something - there is some Canonical Universe Building exercise somewhere on twitter that just looks, for the lack of a better word, not rigorous. But good for all these people, I guess, for riding the hype to glory. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | botusaurus 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
you didn't see because you dont follow peter on twitter. he talked for months now how codex is a better coder. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||