The images are neat, but I would rather throw my laptop in the ocean than read chat transcripts between a human and an AI.

(Science fiction novels excluded, of course.)

▲

vunderba 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Somebody a while back on HN compared sharing AI chat transcripts as the equivalent of telling everyone all about that “amazing dream you had last night”.

▲

486sx33 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

[dead]

▲

echelon 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

We're watching brains harmonize and work together.

There aren't any priors for this, only crude analogies. This is alien contact. This is the spark of fire that kicked off civilization. This is the beginnings of the next industrial age.

But what you're specifically watching here is two brains from two entirely different species communicating and working together.

It doesn't matter that Claude is dumb and a statistical machine with flaws. We're early. This is only just starting.

Imagine the communication paradigms we'll have in the future -

I'm instructing image models with images instead of text. Images are better spatial arguments.

What's better for thought? Probably thought. Language is just an encoding. Imagine what happens when we hook up BCI to this and can wear the AI like an exoskeleton?

But the intermediate, these chat conversations, are amazing to watch. It's like a parent teaching a toddler, except the toddler is a trillion dollar machine that can work harder than a thousand humans at some discrete tasks that used to be impossible for metaheurisic algorithms to crack and required real humans.

It's dreaming alright.

	▲	protocolture 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		>But what you're specifically watching here is two brains from two entirely different species communicating and working together. No this is a dude playing with his chatbot.
	▲	Brian_K_White an hour ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		You're watching someone press buttons on an mp3 player and calling it a religious experience.
	▲	andsoitis an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> This is the spark of fire that kicked off civilization. How can the now influence the past?