What a blunder by Anthropic. We'll see what openclaw turns into and if it sticks around, but still a huge and rare blunder by anthropic

▲

unpwn 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

i dont think so, its trivial to spin up an openclaw clone. the only value here is the brand

▲

SamDc73 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I highly suspect he might even consider Anthropic since they enforced restrictions at some point on OpenClaw form using there APIs

	▲	krashidov 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		yes that's the blunder I'm talking about

▲

rockwotj 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I am sure they made a bid. The blog makes it sounds like he talked to multiple labs.

▲

serf 6 hours ago | parent [-]

they're (Anthropic) also the ones who have been routinely rug-pulling access from projects that try to jump onto the cc api, pushing those projects to oAI.

▲

nl 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Do you have any references for that?

AFAIK Anthropic won't let projects use the Claude Code subscription feature, but actually push those projects to the Claude Code API instead.

	▲	benatkin 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I'd like a reference for it being rug pulling. What happened with OpenCode certainly wasn't rug pulling, unless Anthropic asked them to support using a Claude subscription with it.