They would destroy clothing because it is not sold. This already happens to second hand clothing that is shipped to Africa. Part of it is sold, part of it is dumped. This is well documented.

▲

seszett 40 minutes ago | parent [-]

If part of it is sold, isn't it better than if it had all been destroyed? It's literally what that law is for.

	▲	tjwebbnorfolk 27 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Define what you mean by "better". Putting them on a giant CO2-burning ship to transport around the world to find every last person who wants a $1 shirt is much more harmful to the environment than just throwing it into a hole in the ground and making another one.