i think the worst that can happen is you could be put on a list of dissention.

rockskon 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

A list of people who dissent to KOSA is not a bad list to be on as a constituent.

You need to make it easier for your lawmakers to be on that list too. Show them there's people who won't rake them over the coals for bowing out.

▲

hammock 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Isn’t that the point? Our lawmakers keep track of how many constituents approve or disapprove of pending legislation so they can act accordingly

	▲	rolph 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		so they can act accordingly is the variable, a simple headcount is one thing, but when it creeps like a census, then it is prone to polyusary. putting the consiracy hat on, the exploit is to direct as many installed AGs to push for such bills, with no big letdown if they dont pass, why/because, the demographics on dissention are valuable and are, passed to a hostile federal government.

▲

Trasmatta 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Don't comply in advance

▲

rockskon 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Being active about KOSA won't get you put on a "list of dissenters". This is an issue being pushed by the States and your federal lawmakers, not the executive branch.