| ▲ | add-sub-mul-div 3 hours ago | |
> We have covered the risks of overreliance on AI tools for years If the coverage of those risks brought us here, of what use was the coverage? Another day, another instance of this. Everyone who warned that AI would be used lazily without the necessary fact-checking of the output is being proven right. Sadly, five years from now this may not even result in an apology. People might roll their eyes at you for correcting a hallucination they way they do today if you point out a typo. | ||
| ▲ | esseph 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
> Sadly, five years from now this may not even result in an apology. People might roll their eyes at you for correcting a hallucination they way they do today if you point out a typo. I think this track is unavoidable. I hate it. | ||