What evidence do you have the Glenn Greenwald wants a strongman?

If anything, he has been attacked by numerous 'strong men' (in various governments!) over several years.

Greenwald is a vocal and consistent anti-institutionalist, and this creates the conditions for strongmen to take over. Whether he is aware of having this effect is not relevant.

▲

alejohausner 7 hours ago | parent [-]

He criticizes the military-industrial complex. Don’t you think that’s an institution worth dismantling?

	▲	jeffbee 7 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Greenwald has criticized every institution that exists, so there's not a signal there.
	▲	acdha 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		What’s been dismantled? The major impact of his recent work was helping elect Trump twice and get tech companies to drop anti-disinformation campaigns. The military-industrial complex not only isn’t dismantled, it’s growing!
	▲	bdangubic 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		he not only not criticizes but is the most war-loving president we’ve had in a long time. at least he did right but making DoD what is actually is. america knows nothing but military and he’ll grow it to even more epic proportions once we invade iran and 10 or so other countries as we approach november

▲

api 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Greenwald supports both Putin and Trump, for starters.

He's either insanely clueless, a propagandist who is being dishonest about his goals, or an accelerationist who thinks making things worse will make them better after (magic happens here).

The magic never happens. Any political program that boils down to (1) break everything, (2) magic, (3) things are better, really goes (1) break everything, (2) either things stay broken and you end up a failed state or someone worse takes over.