This is kind of misleading. It says it's an HTML UI library, then it says HTML + CSS, and then it says it also includes JavaScript. Why is this better than, say, DaisyUI?

▲

dang an hour ago | parent | next [-]

(Submitted title was "Oat – Ultra-lightweight, semantic, zero-dependency HTML UI component library" - we've replaced it now)

▲

httpsterio 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Iirc there's a few web components in there which would require js.

▲

villgax 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I just want something that's as easy to use as DaisyUI or even Bulma with one good set of components & themeing(beyond just palletes, like rounding, blur, transparency etc) & I'm good. For all the self-hosting model afficianados surely needing a build platform to create a blackhole of npm modules & internet connectivity for even a single build surely negates the entire point of a coding LLM if we still force it to deal with frontend

	▲	koakuma-chan 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You mean you want DaisyUI but with extended theming, like ability to make inputs, etc, rounded? This is also something I was considering.